News Older babies 'sleep better' in their own room
Older babies 'sleep better' in their own room
Posted On: 05/09/2017
"Babies who sleep in separate rooms from their parents have earlier bedtimes, take less time to nod off and get more shut eye," the Mail Online reports on the results of an international survey looking at sleeping locations and outcomes in infants aged 6 to 12 months.
The parents of more than 10,000 infants aged 6 to 12 months completed an app-based questionnaire. As this was a US-based study, the results were split into two categories: the United States and international (Australia, Brazil, Canada, Great Britain and New Zealand).
The results showed babies who slept in separate rooms slept longer, got to sleep quicker, and were more likely to have a bedtime routine than those who slept in the same bed or room as their parents. Parents were also less likely to perceive bedtime as difficult.
The results seem to confirm the findings of a much smaller study we discussed back in June.
But a range of external factors, such as home environment, breastfeeding, and interaction with family and other caregivers, might also affect babies' sleep.
We can't say for certain that separate rooms are better for all infants. The study didn't look at the effect of babies sharing a room with a sibling, for example.
Current NHS guidance recommends keeping your baby in the same room as you in a separate cot for the first six months.
Placing your baby on their back to sleep from the very beginning, for both day and night sleeps, will reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
The study was carried out by researchers from Saint Joseph's University, Philadelphia, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Johnson and Johnson Consumer, all in the US.
It was funded by JohnsonÂ & Johnson, a multinational medical devices, pharmaceutical and consumer packaged goods manufacturing company, who also developed the mobile app used in this research.
There doesn't seem to be any conflict of interest on the part of the researchers, as the results of the study had no obvious commercial implication.
The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Sleep Medicine.
The Mail Online generally reported accurately on the results of the study itself, but got muddled by claiming that the findings "contradict guidelines by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which recommends babies sleep in the same room as their parents for at least the first six months to reduce their risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)".
This is neither true nor relevant â€“ the study didn't look at the first six months of life, it investigated infants aged 6 to 12 months.
This cross-sectional study used a questionnaire on an app to examine babies' sleep patterns, behaviours and problems in both a US and international sample of infants.
The researchers aimed to see if sleeping arrangements (where the infant slept) affected these sleep-related outcomes.
This type of research can identify patterns and associations between sleep location and sleep outcomes at a specific snapshot in time, but can't show trends over time or look at longer term outcomes.
It also can't determine cause and effect â€“ in other words, that where a baby sleeps directly causes certain sleep outcomes. A range of other factors could also influence this.
Also, it's possible that parents of babies with underlying sleep problems unrelated to where they sleep just prefer to put them in the same bedroom because it's easier for them if their child wakes in the night.
The research involved 6,236 infants and their parents from the US, and 3,798 participants from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Great Britain and New Zealand, who all had infants aged between 6 and 12 months. It looked at the association between sleep location and sleep outcomes.
Participants completed a smartphone app-based expanded version of the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire (BISQ). They also reported demographic information. The app, Johnson's Bedtime Baby Sleep, was free and publicly available.
The questionnaire recorded expected developmental changes in infants and the potential influence of environmental factors.
It asked questions on:
The app also included:
The researchers found 37.2% infants aged 6 to 12 months from the US, and 48.4% in the international sample, slept in a separate room from their parents.
US infants sleeping in a separate room:
Similar results were found for the international sample.
The researchers concluded: "These results indicate that infants aged 6 to 12 months who sleep in a separate room have better parent-reported sleep outcomes in terms of increased sleep duration and sleep consolidation, as well as better sleep health practices (i.e. conforming with commonly recommended sleep behaviours) and parent perception of infant sleep."
This study seems to show that parents of infants aged 6 to 12 months who sleep in a separate room report better infant sleep outcomes, such as sleep times and sleep duration, than parents who keep their infant in the same room or bed.
These findings are similar to a study covered in June 2017, which found "independent sleepers" slept for longer aged nine months than room-sharers.
But there are some considerations that need to be taken into account:
If your baby is over the age of six months, there are no known health reasons why they can't sleep safely in their own room as long as they're always placed on their back to sleep.
Get advice about sleep problems in young children.
Babies who sleep in SEPARATE rooms from their parents have earlier bedtimes, take less time to nod off AND get more shut eye. Mail Online, September 4 2017
Mindell JA, Leichman ES, Walters RM. Sleep Location and Parent-Perceived Sleep Outcomes in Older Infants. Sleep Medicine. Published online August 12 2017